December 2008

Obama’s Forebears

by Ross Kaplan on December 31, 2008

Obama’s Forebears: FDR, Lincoln . . . Gorbachev??

Talk about anticipation: political pundits are already engaged in a spirited debate about which historical leader faced circumstances most closely paralleling the financial crisis now confronting President-elect Obama.

The most obvious candidate is FDR, and the broken economy he inherited in early 1933.

Now like then, the economy is dealing with the aftermath of an enormous asset bubble caused by easy (if not promiscuous) credit and exacerbated by excessive leverage. The carnage includes millions of foreclosed homeowners; a tanking stock market; catastrophic banking and insurance failures; impoverished savers and investors; and the specter of rising unemployment.

Lincoln comes to mind because he also saved the nation from a mortal threat, albeit a political, not economic one.

Through leadership, moral clarity, and sheer resolve, Lincoln prevented the Union from being ripped apart by slavery. Lincoln also appears to be a personal hero of Obama’s, who seems to be emulating Lincoln’s “team of rivals” leadership style. Of course, as the nation’s first Black President, it would hardly be surprising if Obama felt a special affinity for, and kinship with, the Great Emancipator.

But there’s a third, more contemporary leader whose situation and challenges at least superficially evoke Obama’s: Mikhail Gorbachev.

“Change Agents”

Gorbachev’s policies of Glasnost (openness and freedom) and Perestroika (economic restructuring) correctly perceived that the old, Soviet-style command-and-control system required radical reform. Like Obama, Gorbachev was also a figure of great personal appeal, and evident political and intellectual gifts.

Unfortunately (at least for Gorbachev), the changes he initiated spiraled out of his control and ultimately swept away the system he was trying to save (the old U.S.S.R.).

Like Gorbachev, President Obama must preside over a very tricky transition.

His task is to repair and reform a strained system that has already left millions of Americans without homes, without jobs, and with little or no retirement savings. Even before the current financial crisis, tens of millions lacked access to decent health care. As 2009 begins, there are signs that conditions may in fact be deteriorating.

While Obama enters office with a huge store of goodwill amongst everyday Americans — and especially African Americans — he must surely be aware that economic desperation and patience don’t easily coexist.

It’s one thing to campaign on a platform of “change you can believe in.” Delivering the right change– and the right amount of change — is entirely another.

{ 0 comments }

Recession Hits Housing Prices

by Ross Kaplan on December 30, 2008

Oct. Case-Shiller Numbers:
Down 18% from ’07

“People who think they’re going to lose their job don’t buy a home”
–Steven Ricchiuto, chief economist at Mizuho Securities; NY Times (12/30/08)

There’s not much mystery about the most recent leg down in the national housing market: recessions destroy jobs, and people who are unemployed — or worry they may soon be — don’t make major purchases.

For most people, there’s no bigger financial commitment than buying a home.

{ 0 comments }

How’s this for Affordable?

by Ross Kaplan on December 29, 2008

129 Minneapolis Homes for < $35k!

The neighborhoods aren’t swanky, and there’s no guaranty that prices won’t fall further. But on the eve of 2009, no fewer than 135 homes within the city of Minneapolis are for sale for less than $30,000. In many cases, that’s less than the value of the land underneath the home.

–Homes under $15,000: 12

–Homes $15,000- $25,000: 64

–Homes $25,000 – $35,000: 53

Assuming you put down 3% on a $25k home and borrow the rest — as FHA allows you to do — principal and interest on a 30 year mortgage comes to a whopping $138 a month. Compare that with the cost of an average Minneapolis two-bedroom apartment: about $900 a month.

It gets even better. Thanks to recent legislation, qualifying first-time homebuyers receive a tax credit for 10% of the purchase price, or $2,500. The tax credit must be re-paid over the next 15 years.

After you do all the math, it’s basically like living for free the first 18 months — and not much more thereafter.

{ 0 comments }

“The Case Against Case-Shiller”

by Ross Kaplan on December 29, 2008

Bad Numbers??

The S&P/Case-Shiller report for October (there’s a one-month lag) is due to be released tomorrow, and the numbers are likely to be ugly: the Sept. numbers were down 17.4% year-over-year, and down 1.8% month-to-month, respectively, and there’s plenty of anecdotal evidence that things got worse in October. So, to repeat, it’s not going to be pretty.

However, whether the national housing market is actually as bad as Case-Shiller is likely to indicate is debatable.

Twin Cities realtor Pat Paulson has an excellent piece, “The Case Against Case-Shiller,” which, although a year old, does a very nice job of dissecting weaknesses in Case-Shiller’s methodology:

http://activerain.com/blogsview/370858/The-Case-Against-Case

The gist of his (and others’) argument is that, by exclusively focusing on “sales pairs” — back-to-back sales of the same home — Case-Shiller overweights homes that change hands frequently.

Which homes tend to be frequently resold these days? Foreclosures. Nationally, “lender-mediated sales” (short sales and foreclosures) account for about 50%(!) of recent sales volume — more in particularly distressed markets like Miami, parts of Southern California, and Las Vegas.

To no one’s surprise, in a down market, abandoned, neglected houses lose a lot more value, faster, than ones that are owner-occupied. Even though Case-Shiller uses a variety of techniques to adjust for foreclosures, it’s not clear that they’re effective.

Which leaves the question, how accurate is Case-Shiller?

Generalizing about the national housing market from a sample pool dominated by foreclosures is like estimating Americans’ wealth looking only at bankruptcy filings.

{ 0 comments }

Madoff’s Legacy, Cont.

December 28, 2008

Silver Linings vs. Black Linings A silver lining is something good, usually long-term, that comes of something bad and helps redeem it, at least a little bit. So what is a “black lining?” A residual, negative echo of something very bad that continues to reverberate long after the original calamity has faded from memory. Bernie [...]

Read the full article →

Bernie Madoff’s Marketing Insights

December 27, 2008

“Know Your Customer (er, Mark)”In retrospect, disgraced financier cum swindler Bernie Madoff may have been a lousy investor, but he sure was a helluva salesman. How else does one attract $50 billion from thousands of investors and financial institutions worldwide? As best I can discern, herewith are his top five marketing insights (offered in the [...]

Read the full article →

Mortgage Rate Disconnect

December 27, 2008

Dropping Mortgage RatesStill “Artificially” HighWhere should mortgage rates be right now? If historical relationships held, the rate on a 30 year mortgage would be 3.5%(!). No, that’s not a typo; going back a decade or more, long-term mortgages cost typically cost about 150 basis points more than the 10 year U.S. Treasury Bond yield. The [...]

Read the full article →

Public’s Response to Financial Crisis

December 25, 2008

“Fear Factor” Trumps Anger, Outrage — So Far One of the biggest puzzles of the ongoing financial melt-down is, given the manifold examples of greed, recklessness, dereliction of duty, and sheer incompetence on display on Wall Street and elsewhere in recent years, where is the public outrage? The most plausible explanation is that it’s too [...]

Read the full article →